Sucralose: Not So Splenda After All

by John Moody | Affiliate linksComments: 7

sucralose, splenda
Sucralose is the most consumed artificial sweetener in the United States. Grabbed a diet soda, sports or energy drink? It very likely contains it.

How about any number of “reduced sugar” processed foods frequently touted as “healthy” snacks? Examples include muffins, breads, bars, and other convenience foods at the grocery and healthfood store. They probably contain it as well.

Many people who might never otherwise choose foods containing artificial sweeteners are likely consuming sucralose without even realizing it!

The Many Names of Sucralose

If you don’t see the word “sucralose” on the label, food manufacturers have likely hidden it behind one of several brand names such as Splenda, Zerocal, Sukrana, SucraPlus, Candys, Cukren, and Nevella.

Of these, Splenda is the biggest by far. You see it in nearly every restaurant tucked away in little yellow envelopes next to the salt and pepper.

In the billion dollar artificial sweetener industry, Splenda unseated Equal (aspartame), and now accounts for over 60% of the market. Acesulfame potassium is another dangerous artificial sweetener that is gaining ground fast particularly in sports drinks because the chemical name looks like an electrolyte.

How big is this industry? Approximately 40% of American adults consume an artificial sweetener on a daily basis. Up to 80% of Americans consume it a few times per month. (1)

What’s more, the consumption of artificial sweeteners continues to grow rapidly. In just over a decade, adult consumption increased by over 50%. Most disturbing, children increased their consumption by 200% during the same period. (2)

But do people really know what they are getting when they gobble this stuff down?

What is Sucralose

Sucralose containing sweeteners like Splenda consist of three components. Dextrose and maltodextrin comprise approximately 95% by volume. The third element is sucralose.

Both dextrose and maltodextrin are highly refined products usually of genetically modified (GMO) origin. Dextrose is pure sugar, requires no digestion, and has a glycemic index (GI) of 100. By comparison, the GI of white sugar is only 80.

Maltodextrin is an even more heavily refined food additive. The process starts by cooking starch from potatoes, corn, wheat, or other similar crops. Glyphosate laced GMO corn is the usual choice, however.

Then, by adding acids or enzymes, manufacturers break things down further. After purification and further processing, the final product is maltodextrin.

With the same calories as table sugar and a high GI, maltodextrin is a favorite thickener, preservative, fat replacer and overall additive in the processed food industry. It is easy and cheap to produce partly because of the billions in subsidies that industrial agriculture enjoys at taxpayer expense in the United States.

Sucralose is NOT Natural

Neither dextrose nor maltodextrin are natural, traditional, or good to consume. Both are devoid of nutritional value beyond calories, which modern people tend to get in abundance as it is.

As mentioned above, food manufacturers almost exclusively use Roundup Ready GM crops to make them too. This adds further risks from excessive chemical residues. Glyphosate is the most insidious of these.

Despite not a single positive thing to say about dextrose and maltodextrin, they are not the most concerning component of Splenda and other artificial sweeteners containing sucralose.

Chemists create sucralose by replacing three select hydrogen-oxygen molecules in sucrose (table sugar) with three chlorine atoms. Yes, CHLORINE. This is the same toxic stuff most commonly used to disinfect swimming pools, kill bacteria in tap water, and bleach your clothes.

This simple swap makes sucralose 600 times sweeter than sugar!

Sucralose is not found anywhere in nature. It is a lab created substance and 100% artificial. Scientists refer to it as a synthetic organochlorine sweetener.

Is Sucralose Like Aspartame?

The tightly bound chlorine atoms unique to sucralose create a molecular structure that is stable under intense conditions. Unlike most artificial sweeteners, this chemical bond is heat stable even at high temperatures.

You’ve no doubt seen the internet memes that aspartame (Nutrasweet) breaks down into wood alcohol when heated which is then converted to brain damaging formaldehyde (embalming fluid) in the human body. The book Excitoxins by neurologist Dr. Russel Blaylock examines this process in detail.

Not so with sucralose.

Even at 450 F/ 232 C degrees, it remains stable. Thus, it works as a replacement for sugar in baking and cooking. It works unbelievably well for food manufacturers who add it to their highly processed products. It also has the best flavor profile of the artificial sweeteners, with the least disagreeable aftertaste that is easy to mask and/or get used to.

Hence, chefs and cooks tend to prefer it as well.

NOT Calorie Free for Diabetics

One of the big reasons people embrace sucralose containing foods is because of slick marketing. This is facilitated by the FDA, which allows food manufacturers to label some items that contain it as “calorie free.”

Unfortunately, Splenda and brands like it are anything but calorie free.

Sucralose containing sweeteners contain one-third the calories of regular table sugar per serving.

How does Splenda get away with the calorie free label on its little sugar packets then?

The trick is that if a processed food contains less than 5 calories of sugar per serving size, companies can label it calorie free. Incidentally, the FDA allows this trick to label processed foods transfat free too.

Make a packet of sucralose small enough and it qualifies for the calorie free label. It doesn’t matter if people pop three, four, or more packets into their coffee or food. What matters is that the definition of a serving is miniscule enough to slip in under the “less than 5 calories per serving” rule.

But not only is Splenda’s sucralose not calorie free, the research shows that it isn’t safe either.

Splenda Safety

The supposed tightly bound nature of the toxic chlorine atoms is key to claims about sucralose safety. In other words, the FDA based its approval on early research that suggested that it passed through the gastrointestinal tract unchanged. However, recent research has challenged this notion.

This is a critical issue of concern because scientific research links free chlorine and chlorine byproducts to a wide range of health issues. This is why many people drink bottled water or filter tap water to remove the chlorine at a minimum.

Sucralose Health Dangers

The FDA says that sucralose is safe as long as it is used in moderation. Moderation is defined as no more than 23 packets a day of Splenda.

Research conducted to date to discover the truth has produced mixed results.

Unfortunately, like with many areas of research, industry scientists or those who directly or indirectly benefit financially from relationships with particular products and companies are quick to attack and discredit research that raises concerns or problems.

Even still, studies on sucralose consumption point to numerous serious health risks.

Scientifically Supported Health Risks

The peer-reviewed Journals Toxicology and Environmental Health, Trends in Endocrinology & Metabolism, and others have published research questioning the safety of sucralose. The list below summarizes these dangers with corresponding scientific references.

  1. Consuming sucralose alters the amount and quality of beneficial gut flora. (3)
  2. It breaks down under high heat into possibly toxic compounds. (ibid)
  3. Digestion alters at least some of it into unknown and untested compounds with uncertain implications for our health. (ibid)
  4. It disrupts crucial insulin/glucose/glucagon regulation. (ibid)
  5. Consumption inhibits the proper absorption of medications. This includes meds taken for cancer and heart disease. (4)
  6. Usage encourages insulin resistance and the development of type 2 diabetes. (5)
  7. Ingestion elevates risk for coronary heart disease. (6)
  8. Regular use boosts the chance of metabolic syndrome. (ibid)
  9. Usage encourages weight gain and obesity. (ibid)
  10. Consumption shrinks the thymus gland, with potential negative impacts to the immune system. (7)

It seems the FDA needs to review its stance that sucralose is safe for human consumption! No doubt even more research will be released in the coming months and years that further identify and refine the risks.

Stay away from Sucralose (if you can!)

Unfortunately, even with all of these known health risks, sucralose use is rampant across the food industry. This is true especially in low, no, and reduced sugar/calorie products.

Just how widely? Over 4,000 products contained it as of 2010, based on industry funded resources. (6)

If you are trying to avoid it, it bears repeating that food manufacturers hide sucralose behind many brand names. It appears under store brand labels as well.

The good news is that if you are eating a real foods, whole foods, traditional diet, your exposure to Splenda and other sucralose based sweeteners should be pretty sparse.

Stick with raw honey, maple syrup, date sugar and other whole natural sweeteners that won’t damage your health and provide some nutrition along with the sweetness! If you need a zero calorie/GI sweetener, stevia and pure monk fruit sweeteners are much safer choices.

Posted under: Sweeteners

Comments (7)

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    Pin It on Pinterest

    Share This