• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to after header navigation
  • Skip to site footer
the healthy home economist text logo with green silhouette of a person jump cheering

The Healthy Home Economist

embrace your right to a lifetime of health

Get Plus
  • Home
  • About
  • My Books
  • Shopping List
  • Archives
  • Log in
  • Get Plus
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Pinterest
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Get Plus
  • Log in
  • Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • Archives
  • My Books
  • Shopping List
  • Recipes
  • Healthy Living
  • Natural Remedies
  • Green Living
  • Videos
  • Natural Remedies
  • Health
  • Green Living
  • Recipes
  • Videos
  • Subscribe
Healthy Home Economist / Archives / Activism / 4 Year Old’s Veggie Garden Must Go Says USDA Subcontractor

4 Year Old’s Veggie Garden Must Go Says USDA Subcontractor

by Sarah Pope / Affiliate Links ✔

kitchen gardeners internationalWith each passing day, it seems the United States of America, “Land of the Free and Home of the Brave” is becoming more and more like the Communist Russia I learned about in elementary school where people weren’t allowed to grow their own food unless the State “allowed” it.

In this latest crackdown on citizens simply trying to provide for themselves using the most basic of skills – gardening – the USDA’s Rural Development Agency is forbidding Rosie, an industrious 4-year old girl in South Dakota from using a small, unused area outside her subsidized housing unit to grow green vegetables.

Rosie’s mother, Mary (names changed to protect the child’s identity), is single and severely disabled. She and her daughter live on a fixed income disability payment of $628/month. The garden vegetables growing just outside her backdoor lovingly tended by Rosie provide a fresh and healthy addition to their diet that they could not otherwise easily afford.

Rosie started the garden in May 2013, but now the property management company has ordered the garden be removed this week!

The reason?

The property management company claims that gardening goes against the rules set by the USDA’s Rural Development Agency which forbids residents to have structures of any kind within landscaped areas. It seems to me that the practice of growing vegetables by the most needy in our society would take precedence over landscaping, wouldn’t you agree?

I wonder if the USDA plans to establish “rules” about breathing air in subsidized areas too?

The Federal bureaucracy seems to think that it owns those individuals who receive any sort of government assistance and that their behavior is completely within its jurisdiction to control no matter how ridiculous or blatantly un-American the power-tripping “rules” they decide to put in place may be.

Think this is an isolated case?  It’s not.  I write regularly on this blog about these outrageous situations where ordinary citizens are bullied by out of control bureaucrats, the most recent being a Mother in Maine who was harassed and threatened by the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) for feeding her healthy, robust 3 month old son homemade goat milk formula instead of horribly unhealthy commercial formula from the store laced with rancid vegetable oils and GMOs!

What You Can Do Now to Help Rosie

It is truly unfathomable that our country has degenerated to the point where a person can no longer garden without permission from bureaucratic thugs who get paid with our hard earned tax dollars to think up these rules –  not laws – rules that have never been voted on by the elected representatives of the citizens expected to abide by those rules.

If you recall, this is exactly the sort of authoritarian insanity that started the American Revolutionary War (tea party anyone?).

Tell the USDA where it can put its “rules” against gardening by those living in rural, subsidized areas.

Sample Email to USDA

You can copy/paste the email template below to send directly from your email provider. Template provided courtesy of Kitchen Gardeners International, the source of this story.

To: [email protected]

Cc: [email protected], [email protected]

Subject: Allow USDA-subsidized housing residents to grow vegetable gardens

Message body:

Dear Director Meeks,

I urge you to make a loud and clear statement to all the property management companies your agency contracts that USDA-subsidized residents have the right to keep their own vegetable gardens provided that these gardens are actively maintained. Vegetable gardens grow healthy and affordable foods as well as a sense of community. Rather than preventing low-income and disabled residents from providing for themselves, we should be doing everything we can to encourage them. Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Sincerely yours,

(Your name, your town, your state)

Important Updates to This Story

8/27/2013: FINAL UPDATE and details on Rosie’s Victory Garden!

8/26/2013:  A detailed update to this story is provided here.

8/25/2013:  Roger Doiron, Director of Kitchen Gardeners International, has provided more details on this emerging story. The USDA has claimed in email correspondence to Mr. Doiron that it has no written rules preventing Mary and Rosie from having a garden (despite the property management company’s insistence to the contrary). On the other hand, the USDA hasn’t come to Mary and Rosie’s defense either and by allowing the property management company it has a contract with to call the shots and bully Mary and Rosie it is essentially enforcing such a rule no matter what is claimed via email.

Bureaucratic rules are notoriously confusing to understand let alone interpret, but if the USDA stands behind its assertion that there are no “rules” – written OR unwritten – against gardening in subsidized housing, it should stop the property management company under the auspices of the USDA from forcing Mary and Rosie to remove their garden.

The USDA pays most of the rent for Mary and thousands of citizens like her around the United States.  It should do the right thing and insist that property owners and managers of subsidized housing permit residents to grow their own food in well cared for gardens rather than look the other way when residents are bullied for their efforts at self sufficiency.  After all, the stated mission of the USDA Rural Development Agency is to “improve the quality of life in rural America”. Gardening surely would be supportive of this important goal.

Source

Kitchen Gardeners International (KGI).  Rosie and Mary’s real names and exact location in South Dakota have not been revealed in order to protect the identity of a minor child.  Please contact KGI Director Roger Doiron, [email protected] if you wish to further verify the validity of this story.

FacebookPinEmailPrint
Category: Activism, Gardening, Healthy Living, Healthy Pregnancy, Baby & Child
Sarah Pope

Sarah Pope MGA has been a Health and Nutrition Educator since 2002. She is a summa cum laude graduate in Economics from Furman University and holds a Master’s degree from the University of Pennsylvania.

She is the author of three books: Amazon #1 bestseller Get Your Fats Straight, Traditional Remedies for Modern Families, and Living Green in an Artificial World.

Her four eBooks Good Diet…Bad Diet, Real Food Fermentation, Ketonomics, and Ancestrally Inspired Dairy-Free Recipes are available for complimentary download via Healthy Home Plus.

Her mission is dedicated to helping families effectively incorporate the principles of ancestral diets within the modern household. She is a sought after lecturer around the world for conferences, summits, and podcasts.

Sarah was awarded Activist of the Year in 2010 at the International Wise Traditions Conference, subsequently serving on the Board of Directors of the nutrition nonprofit the Weston A. Price Foundation for seven years.

Her work has been covered by numerous independent and major media including USA Today, ABC, and NBC among many others.

You May Also Like

What You Need to Know for a Successful VBAC

Scam Alert: “Vegetarian Fed” Free Range Chicken

Court Denies Hospital Plea for Guardianship of Amish Girl

half dozen frozen eggs thawing on white plate

5 Best Uses for Frozen Eggs (after thawing)

american restaurant

The Decline and Fall of the American Restaurant

summer camp survival

Summer Camp Survival Guide

Feeling Tired More Than You Should?

Get a free chapter of my book Get Your Fats Straight + my weekly newsletter and learn which fats to eat (and which to avoid) to reduce sugar cravings and improve energy significantly!

We send no more than one email per week. You will never be spammed or your email sold, ever.
Loading

Reader Interactions

Comments (371)

  1. Francesca

    Aug 26, 2013 at 2:57 am

    It is just a disgrace how the government is trying to mandate and cap our basic personal freedoms. I can attest that it is not just on a “welfare” level; my family has owned our home and spacious yard for generations and now all of the sudden, they want us to get rid of our pet chicken because there’s a new rule against it. Absurd!.
    I will be signing the petition you have listed in your blog for Rosie’s freedoms, and please take a look at and consider signing mine! We ought to stop this insane level of control before it’s too late. change.org/petitions/luzerne-county-let-dorris-stay-home-continue-allowing-chickens-in-pringle Thank you!

  2. Brenn

    Aug 26, 2013 at 2:26 am

    It took much less of an attack on liberty to spark the REVOLUTIONARY WAR than the naked aggression of an out of control psychopath government that exists today.

  3. Cheryl

    Aug 26, 2013 at 12:39 am

    SARAH, this post is really inappropriate and you need to make a statement about it. It’s divisive for no reason. The situation is tantamount to violating the rental agreement you have with your landlord except that your landlord is the USDA because you need public housing. A better approach would be for rural public housing residence to request garden areas that would not be landscaped and that the residents would tend to by agreement. That is what condo associations do. And I’m sure the USDA would be very open to accomodate that in any facility that had the space. It is rural housing; that is why it is under the USDA and not HUD. The USDA does want people to grow food in a safe way. It doesn’t want it’s tenants to eat food that has been sprayed by lawn chemicals.

    • YeahRight

      Aug 26, 2013 at 1:02 am

      @Cheryl, they shouldn’t allow them to spray pesticides on landscaping that are SO TOXIC that you can’t even safely grow food near it. If you can’t grow near it, you probably should BE near it. If they are spraying toxic chemicals on landscaping, then that means it has already contaminated the local water supply, the air, and the people are ALREADY being exposed to it. These chemicals don’t dissolve or stay in one stagnant place. So what’s the difference if they are already being exposed to them through their water, skin, and air?

  4. Lily

    Aug 25, 2013 at 11:42 pm

    I don’t know what different regulations may be in place in subsidized housing, but I live in an apartment and if I decided to dig up some of their landscaping (even “unused space”) the property management company would have an issue with that. They made an error by trying to pin the blame on USDA regulations, but that doesn’t make this issue a problem of “heartless government bureaucracy”; it’s a problem of one managment company’s short-sighted policies.

  5. Mark

    Aug 25, 2013 at 11:05 pm

    Agency “regulations” are NOT law. They are the agency’s “interpretation” of the law passed by legislators and it’s wide open for disagreement.

    Obviously, some plants or garden don’t qualify as a “structure” within landscaped areas.

    When you disagree with a government agency, you have to request an administrative hearing in “writing” and make sure you get a receipt that you requested the hearing.

    Since this appears to be U.S. agency, I would download and follow the Federal Administrative Procedure Act

    If you are denied whatever your fighting for in the hearing, you then have a set amount of time to appeal to that agency’s commissioners or directors. If you are still denies, then you have a set amount of time to appeal to a judicial court. If it’s a state agency, you would appeal to the appropriate state court. If it’s a federal agency, you would appeal the decision to a the appropriate federal court. You will need to read and study the related Administrative Rules and Procedures.

    If you don’t file a written formal complaint, then you will comply with the agency’s directives or face the consequences.

  6. Linda J Solomon

    Aug 25, 2013 at 11:01 pm

    I was having trouble with my computer and the words (of our government) were supposed to come after aspect and before be. Sorry about that.

  7. Linda J Solomon

    Aug 25, 2013 at 10:58 pm

    How disgusting can an aspect be, when they don’t give a hoot about our health and well being to begin with, allowing Monsatan do their dirty work spreading toxins throughout our food industry along with toxic pesticides. So if people want to grow food and be self sufficient, besides to eat cleaner food; someone steps in to say you can’t do that?! This is totally wrong and where in the hell is American freedom in this situation? Why is it new rules are made up and children are disappointed when they’re just doing something good and healthy? Why do they have to come along and burst their bubble of pride in what they’re doing? This is disgusting and causes me to feel really disappointed yet again with our government and its unnecessary control and stupid nonsensical made up rules!

« Older Comments
Newer Comments »

Sidebar

Mother Nature’s Medicine Cabinet

5 Secrets to a Strong Immune System

Loading

The Healthy Home Economist

Since 2002, Sarah has been a Health and Nutrition Educator dedicated to helping families effectively incorporate the principles of ancestral diets within the modern household. Read More

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Pinterest
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Check Out My Books

Mother Nature’s Medicine Cabinet

5 Secrets to a Strong Immune System

Loading

Contact the Healthy Home Economist. The information on this website has not been evaluated by the FDA and is not intended to diagnose, treat, prevent, or cure any disease. By accessing or using this website, you agree to abide by the Terms of Service, Full Disclaimer, Privacy Policy, Affiliate Disclosure, and Comment Policy.

Copyright © 2009–2025 · The Healthy Home Economist · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc.