• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to after header navigation
  • Skip to site footer
the healthy home economist text logo with green silhouette of a person jump cheering

The Healthy Home Economist

embrace your right to a lifetime of health

Get Plus
  • Home
  • About
  • My Books
  • Shopping List
  • Archives
  • Log in
  • Get Plus
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Pinterest
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Get Plus
  • Log in
  • Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • Archives
  • My Books
  • Shopping List
  • Recipes
  • Healthy Living
  • Natural Remedies
  • Green Living
  • Videos
  • Natural Remedies
  • Health
  • Green Living
  • Recipes
  • Videos
  • Subscribe
Healthy Home Economist / Archives / Activism / CPS Still in Charge After Hearing on Gestapo Style Baby Snatching

CPS Still in Charge After Hearing on Gestapo Style Baby Snatching

by Sarah Pope / Affiliate Links ✔

baby sammyThe right of parents to determine the course of medical treatment for their children has suffered yet another slap in the face.

On April 29, 2013, a hearing took place regarding the Gestapo style abduction by Child Protective Services of 5 month old baby Sammy after his parents, Alex and Anna Nikolayev, took him out of Sutter Memorial Hospital in Sacramento.

They left Sutter Memorial in order to seek a second opinion at Kaiser Permanente, a rival hospital, for Sammy’s flu-like symptoms.

Anna and Alex sought medical treatment at Kaiser because they were extremely concerned about the quality of care baby Sammy was receiving at Sutter Memorial.

When doctors at Sutter Memorial began discussing the possibility of heart surgery for the infant, the alarmed parents took the baby and left as the medical staff would not discharge Sammy so they could seek another opinion regarding the child’s heart murmur.

“If we got the one mistake after another, I don’t want to have my baby have surgery in the hospital where I don’t feel safe,” Anna said.

She added, ”We went from one hospital to another. We just wanted to be safe, that he is in good hands.”

While at the second hospital, medical staff determined Sammy was fine. The attending doctor at Kaiser said in a written statement, “I do not have concern for the safety of the child at home with his parents.”

Despite the all clear from the medical staff at Kaiser, CPS escorted by armed police showed up at the Nikolayev’s home the next day and took baby Sammy in outrageous and dramatic fashion.

Anna’s home video of the incident shows police entering the home.

“I’m going to grab your baby, and don’t resist, and don’t fight me ok?” a Sacramento police officer is heard saying in the video.

Prior to abducting the baby without so much as a warrant, Alex was slammed against a wall, pushed to the ground and his house keys forcibly removed from him after meeting with officers outside.

Worst of all, after taking the baby, CPS returned the child to the protective custody of the exact same hospital the parents had originally fled to seek a second medical opinion – Sutter Memorial – for wanting to perform unnecessary open heart surgery on the infant.

Court Hearing a Slap in the Face to Parent Rights

Alex and AnnaAt a hearing on the matter, Sacramento Superior Court Judge Paul Seave determined that custody should be immediately returned to the parents.

The Nikolayevs can now see Sammy whenever they want. They also supposedly now have full control over the child’s medical decisions.

In reality, however, the Nikolayevs are still under the thumb of CPS and their rights as parents continue to be violated.

Rather than the child returning home where the parents would continue under the care of medical staff at Kaiser Permanente which was their original choice, baby Sammy was transferred by court order to yet a third hospital – Stanford Medical Center.

The judge also ruled that Anna and Alex must follow all medical advice from now on, including not taking their child from Stanford Medical Center without proper discharge.

Why are Anna and Alex being forced to follow the medical advice of Stanford Medical Center and not the medical staff at Kaiser Permanente who determined the child was safe at home for the time being?

Why is this child still in the hospital and not at home and under the supervision of the medical staff the parents originally chose?

Most alarming, Child Protective Services is still involved with this case even after its Gestapo style abduction of the child as captured on home video.

While Sammy will be returned to the custody of his parents upon discharge from Stanford Medical Center, CPS will continue to monitor the situation with regular home visits by a social worker.

Why is CPS being permitted by the court to monitor this child when the parents did nothing wrong?

Inexplicably, Alex and Anna are still vulnerable to future action by CPS for the “crime” of seeking the medical care for Sammy that they saw fit.

Welcome to Soviet Amerika comrades.

 

Sarah, The Healthy Home Economist

Sources:  Judge Orders Transport of Baby Sammy to Stanford Medical Center

Baby Taken By CPS Returned, Parents Ordered To ‘Follow All Medical Advice’

Baby returned to parents after mix-up over ‘neglect’

FacebookPinEmailPrint
Category: Activism, Healthy Living, Healthy Pregnancy, Baby & Child
Sarah Pope

Sarah Pope MGA has been a Health and Nutrition Educator since 2002. She is a summa cum laude graduate in Economics from Furman University and holds a Master’s degree from the University of Pennsylvania.

She is the author of three books: Amazon #1 bestseller Get Your Fats Straight, Traditional Remedies for Modern Families, and Living Green in an Artificial World.

Her four eBooks Good Diet…Bad Diet, Real Food Fermentation, Ketonomics, and Ancestrally Inspired Dairy-Free Recipes are available for complimentary download via Healthy Home Plus.

Her mission is dedicated to helping families effectively incorporate the principles of ancestral diets within the modern household. She is a sought after lecturer around the world for conferences, summits, and podcasts.

Sarah was awarded Activist of the Year in 2010 at the International Wise Traditions Conference, subsequently serving on the Board of Directors of the nutrition nonprofit the Weston A. Price Foundation for seven years.

Her work has been covered by numerous independent and major media including USA Today, ABC, and NBC among many others.

You May Also Like

cows grazing on a grassy hillside

10/2023 UPDATE: Strategies for Avoiding mRNA “Vaccine Meat” (organic is no failsafe)

blood thinning medication in a glass bowl with a red thread heart

Vitamin K2 and Blood Clotting. Is it Safe for Those on Blood Thinners?

Israel Suspends Water Fluoridation Citing Health Concerns

masa dough on a wooden cutting board

Does Masa Harina Corn Need to Be Soaked?

Health Lessons Learned in a Buddhist Monastery

Health Lessons Learned in a Buddhist Monastery

breast thermography

Thermography: A Perfect Alternative to Mammograms?

Feeling Tired More Than You Should?

Get a free chapter of my book Get Your Fats Straight + my weekly newsletter and learn which fats to eat (and which to avoid) to reduce sugar cravings and improve energy significantly!

We send no more than one email per week. You will never be spammed or your email sold, ever.
Loading

Reader Interactions

Comments (231)

  1. Ashley Pollard via Facebook

    May 1, 2013 at 11:29 am

    Gina I was wondering what the diagnosis from the 2nd hospital was… Did they take the baby to the 2nd hospital immediately after walking out of the 1st hospital? I read that the child was taken from its HOME. If someone tells parents their child needs heart surgery, whether theyre right or wrong, why would the parents take the baby home and not to another hospital? Am I missing something? There are so many different versions of this story…

    Reply
    • Trinity

      May 1, 2013 at 1:24 pm

      Yes, you are missing a lot. The parents took the child directly from one hospital to the other. The egotistical doctor at the first hospital wouldn’t sign the discharge papers so they could get a second opinion.

    • Carolyn

      May 1, 2013 at 1:36 pm

      Ashley, the parents went directly to Kaiser after leaving Sutter. I live in the Sac region and get updates on FB.

    • Holly

      May 1, 2013 at 1:44 pm

      Yes you are missing the crucial part. They took the baby to another doc at Kaiser who said he was fine to go home with his parents. So after their second opinion and being deemed FINE at least to go home- they did then the next day CPS came and yanked the baby out of his mothers arms.

  2. Stacey Gorham via Facebook

    May 1, 2013 at 11:26 am

    They never gave permission or signed consent for that heart surgery either.

    Reply
  3. Lori Matheson-Smith via Facebook

    May 1, 2013 at 11:25 am

    I wonder why they do not go back to Russia? That would be a way around this. Is there anything stopping them from going to Russia?

    Reply
  4. wendell

    May 1, 2013 at 11:24 am

    Heather,
    My niece was born with a heart murmur and is 40 years old and has never had to have surgery. I agree with Sarah, the parents should choose the hospital, not the court.

    Reply
  5. Ruhi Deabreu via Facebook

    May 1, 2013 at 11:24 am

    I am praying for them. Dats all we can do for them is pray n support. The govt is outrageous in their actions since I think they no they had no reason to be involved but since the case got a lot of attention r trying to prove their weight to the masses

    Reply
  6. Gina Schwartz via Facebook

    May 1, 2013 at 11:22 am

    Ashley Pollard: Obviously the baby did not need the heart surgery if another doctor discharged the baby to go home! Either way it comes down to your child is “your” child not the governments & not the doctors that many times order and perform procedures for money purposes, insurance fraud, etc rather than for actual patient need.

    Reply
  7. Trixie Grohman Ferguson via Facebook

    May 1, 2013 at 11:22 am

    Liberal judges = liberal socialist outcomes. It’s California, that’s how they’ve rolled for YEARS

    Reply
    • Beloved1

      May 4, 2013 at 1:23 pm

      Absolute pure ignorant statement. This has NOTHING to do with how CA votes. As if this family deserves this for living in CA. Horrible.

  8. Xrene Xexixrxs via Facebook

    May 1, 2013 at 11:22 am

    you cannot leave the country if cps has a case open

    Reply
  9. Peggy Summy via Facebook

    May 1, 2013 at 11:20 am

    If they move now, while under CPS care-they will likely lose the child and be charged with kidnapping and child endangerment. If they moved to TX, at least in the past, TX has always reviewed everything from the start and made their own decisions without following blindly another states opinions.

    Reply
  10. Peggy Summy via Facebook

    May 1, 2013 at 11:19 am

    But in California-YES! 🙁

    Reply
« Older Comments
Newer Comments »

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recipe Rating




Sidebar

Mother Nature’s Medicine Cabinet

5 Secrets to a Strong Immune System

Loading

The Healthy Home Economist

Since 2002, Sarah has been a Health and Nutrition Educator dedicated to helping families effectively incorporate the principles of ancestral diets within the modern household. Read More

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Pinterest
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Check Out My Books

Mother Nature’s Medicine Cabinet

5 Secrets to a Strong Immune System

Loading

Contact the Healthy Home Economist. The information on this website has not been evaluated by the FDA and is not intended to diagnose, treat, prevent, or cure any disease. By accessing or using this website, you agree to abide by the Terms of Service, Full Disclaimer, Privacy Policy, Affiliate Disclosure, and Comment Policy.

Copyright © 2009–2025 · The Healthy Home Economist · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc.