With each passing day, it seems the United States of America, “Land of the Free and Home of the Brave” is becoming more and more like the Communist Russia I learned about in elementary school where people weren’t allowed to grow their own food unless the State “allowed” it.
In this latest crackdown on citizens simply trying to provide for themselves using the most basic of skills – gardening – the USDA’s Rural Development Agency is forbidding Rosie, an industrious 4-year old girl in South Dakota from using a small, unused area outside her subsidized housing unit to grow green vegetables.
Rosie’s mother, Mary (names changed to protect the child’s identity), is single and severely disabled. She and her daughter live on a fixed income disability payment of $628/month. The garden vegetables growing just outside her backdoor lovingly tended by Rosie provide a fresh and healthy addition to their diet that they could not otherwise easily afford.
Rosie started the garden in May 2013, but now the property management company has ordered the garden be removed this week!
The reason?
The property management company claims that gardening goes against the rules set by the USDA’s Rural Development Agency which forbids residents to have structures of any kind within landscaped areas. It seems to me that the practice of growing vegetables by the most needy in our society would take precedence over landscaping, wouldn’t you agree?
I wonder if the USDA plans to establish “rules” about breathing air in subsidized areas too?
The Federal bureaucracy seems to think that it owns those individuals who receive any sort of government assistance and that their behavior is completely within its jurisdiction to control no matter how ridiculous or blatantly un-American the power-tripping “rules” they decide to put in place may be.
Think this is an isolated case? It’s not. I write regularly on this blog about these outrageous situations where ordinary citizens are bullied by out of control bureaucrats, the most recent being a Mother in Maine who was harassed and threatened by the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) for feeding her healthy, robust 3 month old son homemade goat milk formula instead of horribly unhealthy commercial formula from the store laced with rancid vegetable oils and GMOs!
What You Can Do Now to Help Rosie
It is truly unfathomable that our country has degenerated to the point where a person can no longer garden without permission from bureaucratic thugs who get paid with our hard earned tax dollars to think up these rules – not laws – rules that have never been voted on by the elected representatives of the citizens expected to abide by those rules.
If you recall, this is exactly the sort of authoritarian insanity that started the American Revolutionary War (tea party anyone?).
Tell the USDA where it can put its “rules” against gardening by those living in rural, subsidized areas.
Sample Email to USDA
You can copy/paste the email template below to send directly from your email provider. Template provided courtesy of Kitchen Gardeners International, the source of this story.
Cc: [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Allow USDA-subsidized housing residents to grow vegetable gardens
Message body:
Dear Director Meeks,
I urge you to make a loud and clear statement to all the property management companies your agency contracts that USDA-subsidized residents have the right to keep their own vegetable gardens provided that these gardens are actively maintained. Vegetable gardens grow healthy and affordable foods as well as a sense of community. Rather than preventing low-income and disabled residents from providing for themselves, we should be doing everything we can to encourage them. Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Sincerely yours,
(Your name, your town, your state)
Important Updates to This Story
8/27/2013: FINAL UPDATE and details on Rosie’s Victory Garden!
8/26/2013: A detailed update to this story is provided here.
8/25/2013: Roger Doiron, Director of Kitchen Gardeners International, has provided more details on this emerging story. The USDA has claimed in email correspondence to Mr. Doiron that it has no written rules preventing Mary and Rosie from having a garden (despite the property management company’s insistence to the contrary). On the other hand, the USDA hasn’t come to Mary and Rosie’s defense either and by allowing the property management company it has a contract with to call the shots and bully Mary and Rosie it is essentially enforcing such a rule no matter what is claimed via email.
Bureaucratic rules are notoriously confusing to understand let alone interpret, but if the USDA stands behind its assertion that there are no “rules” – written OR unwritten – against gardening in subsidized housing, it should stop the property management company under the auspices of the USDA from forcing Mary and Rosie to remove their garden.
The USDA pays most of the rent for Mary and thousands of citizens like her around the United States. It should do the right thing and insist that property owners and managers of subsidized housing permit residents to grow their own food in well cared for gardens rather than look the other way when residents are bullied for their efforts at self sufficiency. After all, the stated mission of the USDA Rural Development Agency is to “improve the quality of life in rural America”. Gardening surely would be supportive of this important goal.
Source
Kitchen Gardeners International (KGI). Rosie and Mary’s real names and exact location in South Dakota have not been revealed in order to protect the identity of a minor child. Please contact KGI Director Roger Doiron, [email protected] if you wish to further verify the validity of this story.
Your article loses credibility with this line: “laced with rancid vegetable oils and GMOs!”
Formula is not and never has been ‘laced with GMOs’ and I’m pretty sure there are strict controls in place to ensure fresh ingredients are used.
I believe that people should be able to make sensible food choices that suit their needs, but making incorrect statements in articles like this isn’t helpful.
My first though on this was “Why did they let the garden grow all summer long just to have it removed at harvest time.” Then I thought perhaps her climate in South Dakota is cold and may have a fairly short growing season. I live in a cold climate and plant near the end of May and have been harvesting for at least 2 months now. We will be getting frost soon. I don’t agree with just tearing up a 4 year old’s garden, but perhaps they waited until now in order for her to harvest most of the summer. I’m hoping she and her mother will seek out permission and find out the limits of what they will be able to do next year. Please people, take a deep breath and think before you fly off the handle. Remember you catch more flies with honey than with vinegar.
This story reminded me of this TED talk of what is happening in South Central LA,
Ron Finely, the guerilla gardener – he’s very inspiring and a wonderful example of what can be done! If the link doesn’t send, look him up, it’s only a 10 min talk.
http://www.ted.com/talks/ron_finley_a_guerilla_gardener_in_south_central_la.html
Gardening in housing projects could be a big positive for families like Elsie. The food production, of course, helps the budget; but there are all kinds of other spin-off benefits. Exercise, community involvement, and learning the value of work.
When you take government shekels, be prepared to wear government shackles.
LIBERATE ELSIE from federal tyranny!
Great article, totally agree that our government is totally screwed up and we need to do something about it. I just wanted to point out a factual mistake, the Boston Tea Party was not the first act of rebellion against the British, in fact the first act of revolt was almost a full year prior to that. It happened in Warwick, RI and a group of men overtook a ship called the Gaspee and took the soldiers and captain off the ship and burned it and sank it. There was shots fired upon the British and it was true battle.
A plant is a plant, within greenspace or landscaping. It is not a structure. The person requesting the removal is misapplying the regulation due to misunderstanding. The FDA is not making the graden disappear, it is the property managment company.
Yeah, exactly! Since when is a garden counted as a “structure” ?!
When it has raised beds supported by a wooden structure (as in this case).
Another way to help: those who have non “landscaped areas” (their homes) to allow Rosie and others to grow directly on their properties. We need to get back to sharing the food burden. If we all grow a garden, and let those who can’t have gardens work with us, we can change EVERYTHING!
Promotion of self-reliance through gardening is exactly what the founders meant when they wrote, “promotion of the general welfare” in the Constitution.
There is an important difference between “promoting the general welfare” and “providing for the common defence.”
Promotion is “talking it up” or “encouraging”.
“Providing for” is actually delivering the goods and services.
We should be doing everything we can to “promote” self reliance through gardening.
“The Federal bureaucracy seems to think that it owns those individuals who receive any sort of government assistance and that their behavior is completely within its jurisdiction to control no matter how ridiculous or blatantly un-American the power-tripping “rules” they decide to put in place may be.”
It’s interesting how they control a 4 year old girl for growing vegetables, yet don’t do anything to those who trade their food stamps for money to buy outrageous things like designer bags, drugs, acrylic nails (which, by the way, I can’t have because as a working person paying for their “subsidies”, I can’t afford!). Where is the bullying on those types of outrages??!!