• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to after header navigation
  • Skip to site footer
The Healthy Home Economist

The Healthy Home Economist

embrace your right to a lifetime of health

Get Plus
  • Home
  • About
  • My Books
  • Shopping List
  • Archives
  • Log in
  • Get Plus
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Pinterest
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Get Plus
  • Log in
  • Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • Archives
  • My Books
  • Shopping List
  • Recipes
  • Healthy Living
  • Natural Remedies
  • Green Living
  • Videos
  • Natural Remedies
  • Health
  • Green Living
  • Recipes
  • Videos
  • Subscribe
Healthy Home Economist / Archives / Activism / Merck: Dead Vioxx Victims Worth $1500 Each

Merck: Dead Vioxx Victims Worth $1500 Each

by Sarah Pope / Affiliate Links ✔

During the 40 years my Father practiced medicine, he refused to prescribe any drug that had been on the market for less than 10 years. He didn’t trust the FDA to objectively assess whether a drug was truly safe before it was approved for use by the general public.

His caution in writing prescriptions proved wise. He never lost a patient due to complications from a drug he himself prescribed.

Unfortunately, most conventional doctors are much more liberal with prescribing drugs. No doubt this is a contributing reason for the 100,000+ deaths that occur every single year due to adverse drug reactions.

Vioxx, manufactured by Merck, is perhaps the most highly publicized example of a drug that should never have been approved and yet managed to stay on the market for 5 long years. Hawked by celebrities like Olympic gold medalists Dorothy Hamill and Bruce Jenner, the rise and fall of Vioxx illustrates how a drug company’s masterful public relations and aggressive marketing combined with a passively negligent FDA can contribute billions of dollars annually to the bottom line.

Once considered a blockbuster arthritis drug, Vioxx was marketed in more than 80 countries and raked in worldwide sales of $2.5 billion in 2003 shortly before it was globally removed from the market in 2004. From 1999-2003, Vioxx is estimated to have caused more than 27,000 heart attacks or sudden cardiac deaths in America alone.  

Despite the death and destruction wreaked by Vioxx around the world, the pharmaceutical industry is no more motivated today than it was 10 years ago to be thorough and cautious when assessing the safety of a new drug being brought to market.

It is quite simply a more profitable business decision for companies like Merck to cut corners when assessing a drug’s safety and lean on the FDA to get drugs approved quickly because even when thousands upon thousands of people are harmed or killed as was the case with Vioxx, the damages from lawsuits are trivial compared with the revenue earned by the drug in the years it manages to stay on the market.

Payouts to victims or victims’ families are nothing more than a minor cost of doing business that pales in comparison to the blockbuster revenues to be earned for shareholders and executive bonuses.

Case in point.

Last month, Merck reached a settlement with the 1700 Australians who claimed Vioxx gave them heart problems or killed their loved ones.

The settlement amount?

A paltry $540,000, which translates to $314 per claimant!  In addition, the settlement stipulates that no future claims could be brought against Merck for the drug – even by those who were not part of the current proceedings!

Even more shocking, Gerard Dalton, representing the claimants, said that most claimants will never receive a dime.  He said that only 200-300 of the 1700 claimants would meet the “eligibility requirements” necessary to receive compensation.

Even if a claimant proves eligible for payout, the settlement amount is so low that the maximum that will be received is $2000 for living claimants and $1500 for the families of dead victims.

Even the judge responsible for approving the settlement questioned its fairness.

Federal Court Justice Christopher Jessup said the agreement did not take into account individual circumstances and may not be fair to those who had a stronger case against the drug company.

 “I want to know what’s really lying around and whether people’s interests or rights are being affected.

I must say that I’m having difficulty coming to grips with why the settlement should be regarded as fair and reasonable in the interests of all group members … without any attempt to make a distinction between those who would be more likely to establish causation.”

Justice Jessup also questions how the settlement could be binding on people who were not even involved in the current proceedings and said the condition did not strike him “as being a very obvious kind of justice”.

There is no doubt that this settlement, if you can even call it that, is in no way justice or adequate compensation for the Australians who suffered or died from using Vioxx.

But what a sweet deal for Merck. With slaps on the wrist like this, you can be sure more drug debacles as bad or worse than Vioxx loom on the horizon.  Financial remuneration to victims represents no deterrent for unethical or even criminal behavior from the pharmaceutical industry.

Sources:

Judge queries fairness of Vioxx settlement

How did the Vioxx debacle happen?

FacebookPinEmailPrint
Category: Activism
Sarah Pope

Sarah Pope MGA has been a Health and Nutrition Educator since 2002. She is a summa cum laude graduate in Economics from Furman University and holds a Master’s degree from the University of Pennsylvania.

She is the author of three books: the bestseller Get Your Fats Straight, Traditional Remedies for Modern Families, and Living Green in an Artificial World.

Her four eBooks Good Diet…Bad Diet, Real Food Fermentation, Ketonomics, and Ancestrally Inspired Dairy-Free Recipes are available for complimentary download via Healthy Home Plus.

Her mission is dedicated to helping families effectively incorporate the principles of ancestral diets within the modern household. She is a sought after lecturer around the world for conferences, summits, and podcasts.

Sarah was awarded Activist of the Year in 2010 at the International Wise Traditions Conference, subsequently serving on the Board of Directors of the nutrition nonprofit the Weston A. Price Foundation for seven years.

Her work has been covered by numerous independent and major media including USA Today, ABC, and NBC among many others.

You May Also Like

10 Year Old Strip Searched by School Official Over Lunch Ruckus

Sustainable Farmer’s Response to “God Made a Farmer” Superbowl Ad

A Tale of Exploding Watermelons and Fruit Fed Fish

Genetic Roulette: The Movie You Need to See About GM Foods

Zoning Scrooges Threaten Farmer’s Christmas Tree Giveaway

4 Year Old’s Veggie Garden Must Go Says USDA Subcontractor

Going to the Doctor a Little Too Often?

Get a free chapter of my book Traditional Remedies for Modern Families + my newsletter and learn how to put Nature’s best remedies to work for you today!

We send no more than one email per week. You will never be spammed or your email sold, ever.
Loading

Reader Interactions

Comments (23)

  1. Vivian Fuentes

    Aug 10, 2018 at 4:35 pm

    My mother passed away, she was on the list of the claim, we never received a penny for her death, and she pass all their gates.how sad could be, for them my mother was just a piece of meat.

    Reply
  2. Melanie R Treadway via Facebook

    Jun 2, 2013 at 10:16 pm

    For Jenn Treadway to read

    Reply
« Older Comments

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recipe Rating




Sidebar

Mother Nature’s Medicine Cabinet

5 Secrets to a Strong Immune System

Loading

The Healthy Home Economist

Since 2002, Sarah has been a Health and Nutrition Educator dedicated to helping families effectively incorporate the principles of ancestral diets within the modern household. Read More

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Pinterest
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Check Out My Books

Mother Nature’s Medicine Cabinet

5 Secrets to a Strong Immune System

Loading

Contact the Healthy Home Economist. The information on this website has not been evaluated by the FDA and is not intended to diagnose, treat, prevent, or cure any disease. By accessing or using this website, you agree to abide by the Terms of Service, Full Disclaimer, Privacy Policy, Affiliate Disclosure, and Comment Policy.

Copyright © 2009–2023 · The Healthy Home Economist · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc.

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!