The Annals of Medicine, a peer reviewed medical journal, recently published a startling article which questions whether HPV vaccine policy and evidence based medicine are, in fact, at odds.
The key messages published with this article are a scathing rebuttal to the vaccine industry’s hollow claims of the safety and efficacy of Gardasil and Cervarix, the two HPV vaccines being relentlessly and aggressively pushed on our young adolescent girls and now even boys. In California, a new law stipulates that children as young as 12 can accept the HPV jab without parental consent!
In this eye opening article, authors Lucija Tomljenovic and Christopher A. Shaw, of the University of British Columbia, point out the following with regard to HPV vaccination (excerpt from the full article):
- To date, the efficacy of HPV vaccines in preventing cervical cancer has not been demonstrated, while the vaccine risks remain to be fully evaluated.
- Current worldwide HPV immunization practices with either of the two HPV vaccines (Gardasil or Cervarix) appear to be neither justified by long-term health benefits nor economically viable, nor is there any evidence that HPV vaccination (even if proven effective against cervical cancer) would reduce the rate of cervical cancer beyond what Pap screening has already achieved.
- Cumulatively, the list of serious adverse reactions related to HPV vaccination includes deaths, convulsions, paraesthesia, paralysis, Guillain-Barre syndrome, transverse myelitis, facial palsy, chronic fatigue syndrome, anaphylaxis, autoimmune disorders, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolisms, and cervical cancers!
- Because the HPV vaccination program has global coverage, the long-term health of many women may be at risk against still unknown vaccine benefits.
Couldn’t be any more clear, could it?
Those who get the HPV vaccine are hapless guinea pigs for the vaccine industry. Nothing beneficial has been proven with regard to the HPV vaccine and the risks have yet to be fully determined.
It would behoove wise parents to carefully examine studies such as this as our children are increasingly being targeted for financial exploitation by the vaccine industry with useless and dangerous shots such as Gardasil.
Sarah, The Healthy Home Economist
|
|
{ 68 comments… read them below or add one }
Now to take on the other vaccines…
@Ilana Good point .. if HPV vaccination policy is neither safe nor effective and those doctors who promote it are blinding accepting “accepted vaccination policy” without adequate evidence, then this brings into question all vaccines doesn’t it?
Sure does.
Stanley Fishman\’s last post: Give the Gift of Real Food
It would, except that all the evidence shows that the vaccine is in fact safe and effective. You can’t believe everything you read.
Amen, sister!
YUP!
Protect your children from exploitation from the vaccine industry!!
Sarah, have you seen anything about boys contracting HPV from girls who have received the vax?
It is not a live vaccine, so the virus cannot be passed on from vaccination.
That is disinformation. Many 9 and 10 year old girls that received this vaccine now have genital warts and lesions, yet haven’t had any sexual contact.
The polio epidemic in Africa is linked directly to the vaccines they have been forcefully administering as well—
Please take time to study more before you keep spreading this destructive info
No, Carolyn is right, Gardasil only contains the viral coat protein (and maybe some DNA for the viral coat protein); it doesn’t contain any of the proteins or genes that are needed for the virus to reproduce or cause cancer. See http://kegel.com/hpv/safety/ for links.
Perhaps you’re basing your remarks on the Judicial Watch story, which said 62 girls developed warts after vaccination. The simplest explanation of this is that they had been infected before vaccination. So I did a VAERS search for reports of warts that also mentioned whether the patient had had sex before. There were 11 such reports: five with no sexual activity: 401701 276684 279561 338700 313079, and six with sexual activity: 432113 283948 285682 325485 399307 305938. So that’s five reports of warts without sexual activity. Out of 40 million doses. That, plus the fact that Gardasil is a very very incomplete virus-like particle, makes it seem very unlikely that the vaccine could have caused those five reported cases of warts.
Polio’s a very different vaccine. The Global Polio Eradication Initiative has been using a live virus vaccine that contains a complete virus with all the genes needed to cause illness. Looks like they are planning to switch to the inactivated virus vaccine; see http://www.virology.ws/2009/02/26/dreaming-inactivated-poliovirus-vaccine/
That should get rid of vaccine-caused polio.
Today of all days this stuff is really getting my goat. Why are people so blind?? Normally I can ignore it but I am PMSing :S
@Joanna Not seen anything like this but I’m sure some very strange things will occur from this vaccine as the full risks become evident over time.
Respected Medical Journal Disses Gardasil http://t.co/HQHi4tdG http://t.co/BNYBFe8I
I think there are too many vaccines we are expected to have overall in our lifetime. It makes you wonder what all of them are really doing to us.
The cervical cancer rate is so slow it doesn’t even warrant a vaccine anyways. Teach the kids not to blindly follow vaccine propaganda as its really nothing more than Big Pharma profiteering.
My understanding is that at least two countries, India and France, have rejected the vaccine because of the large number of adverse reactions. There is no way I would let my children get this vaccine–and the crazy thing is that not only HPV is behaviorally contracted (which means that choosing to NOT engage in risky behavior reduces chance of contraction to zero), but that most cases of HPV clear up on their own within a couple of years. The vaccine only addresses a couple strains, out of several of them any way. The whole thing is a big scam to make loads of money for the vaccine industry and nothing more.
Your comment needs a “Like” button!!
Respected Medical Journal Disses Gardasil http://t.co/5ORKfyCQ
It is shocking that Merck the manufacturers and other promoters know so little about Gardasil.
http://vactruth.com/2011/11/04/27-dirty-little-vaccine-secrets/
Respected Medical Journal Disses Gardasil http://t.co/bRZkt4f6
Sarah,
Can you site your source for the article? I can’t find it on-line…thanks
Click on the link in the article.
Sarah, TheHealthyHomeEconomist\’s last post: Respected Medical Journal Disses Gardasil
Oops, LOL! Thanks
Respected Medical Journal Disses Gardasil http://t.co/7mXAsMdu
Respected Medical Journal Disses Gardasil-Very important info-especially since now boys will be getting this shot too! http://t.co/OSMQPST6
Respected Medical Journal Disses Gardasil — The Healthy Home Economist http://t.co/LlLXqTx0
None of the links lead to the journal article. Do you have the issue? I can look it up that way. Thanks!
Just click on the link that says “full article” above. I just checked it myself. It works fine.
Sarah, TheHealthyHomeEconomist\’s last post: Respected Medical Journal Disses Gardasil
@mcomeslast http://t.co/2fAglded – try that and let me know if it doesn’t work. Sometimes Twitter stuffs up links!
Annals of Medicine, 2011; Early Online, 1–12
Sarah, TheHealthyHomeEconomist\’s last post: Respected Medical Journal Disses Gardasil
It’s possible the printed issue is not out yet and only early release online .. this is breaking news.
Sarah, TheHealthyHomeEconomist\’s last post: Respected Medical Journal Disses Gardasil
“Disses” is a very scientific word with which to start this.
I’m interested that an opthalmologist does not have better things to do with his time and skills than to do this kind of review funded by foundations with agendas. Yeah, it’s not only big Pharma that has agendas which may introduce bias. But they are forced (and indeed also these days have longer-term financial imperatives) to produce scientific evidence which is extensively scrutinised.
It’d take me too long to point out all of the issues with this article. Of course studies of the efficacy of this type of vaccine will take up to 40years. This is the first of its kind. Is it ethical to deny women the benefits while this is established? When the cost comes down the benefits in countries unable to afford decent screening programs will be very significant. While you may doubt the motivations of drug companies, you must recognise that development of drugs and vaccines is an extremely costly exercise, and unfortunately innovation wouldn’t happen without them.
It is hardly breaking news and is published in a fairly obscure medical journal (with a name similar to the much more highly respected Annals of Internal Medicine).
Hahahahahahahah. A peer reviewed journal is obscure? Loving how you pro-vax people are squirming with this one.
Sarah, TheHealthyHomeEconomist\’s last post: Respected Medical Journal Disses Gardasil
Oh, and the word “disses” was used to get your attention. Looks like it worked.
Sarah, TheHealthyHomeEconomist\’s last post: Respected Medical Journal Disses Gardasil
$100 says you’re making money on this vaccine too (same with the person below). The way you sneer about drugs and vaccine development being a costly exercise gave you away.
Sarah, TheHealthyHomeEconomist\’s last post: Respected Medical Journal Disses Gardasil
I’m amazed how brainwashed and clueless Carolyn is. She is obviously pawn for Big Pharma.
This paper looks like it covers every one of sanevax.org’s list of concerns about Gardasil; it’s kind of like an academic version of sanevax.
Unfortunately, making the same arguments in an academic paper doesn’t make them any more valid.
They show their anti-vaccine bias in several ways. For instance, they compare the number of Gardasil adverse reports to the number of cancer deaths; that’s unfair. The proper comparison is the number of Gardasil deaths to the number of cancer deaths.
Second, they don’t include the results of the large HMO studies that looked at whether Gardasil caused autoimmune disease.
Much of their argument rests on the observation that we haven’t been watching long enough to know for sure whether cancer rates will go down. Yet we already know that Gardasil is very effective at preventing CIN2/3 lesions, and we know that CIN2/3 is the neccessary precursor to cervical cancer. We also know that HPV tests are as good as pap smears for preventing cancer deaths. We also have a good working understanding of the mechanisms by which HPV causes cancer. Putting it all together, the evidence for Gardasil preventing cancer is very strong.
Finally, they object that the vaccine might not last a lifetime. But in Australia, the vaccine is already lowering the incidence of genital warts to near zero. If we achieve herd immunity for HPV, it won’t matter if the vaccine only lasts five years – everybody’s risk will be lower anyway.
I urge people to trust statistics and serious scientific studies, and not judge this vaccine on the basis of hearsay and worries, as are presented by this paper and by sanevax in general.
$100 says you’re making money on this vaccine.
Sarah, TheHealthyHomeEconomist\’s last post: Respected Medical Journal Disses Gardasil
Nope! I’m a software engineer. I have a BS in engineering and biology from Caltech, and I still enjoy reading research papers. I worked part time in neurobiology labs for a few terms while I was in school, but otherwise have never made any money in the field that I know of. But I’m not pro big pharma; I suspect the new CFC-free inhaler requirement is there solely to make inhalers more expensive, and am still bitter that the Republicans prohibited the government from bargaining for better prices for drugs for Medicare patients.
I only started looking at HPV a couple weeks ago; my niece has already had Gardasil, and my son will have it when he turns 9 next year; I’d like him to be protected against throat cancer, and against carrying HPV to his partner(s), if and when he has any. As I was learning about HPV, I kept notes in a little web page ( http://kegel.com/hpv ); I added http://kegel.com/hpv/qualms/ for notes about why some people object to vaccination. (I haven’t quite figured that out yet – it’s like trying to understand the appeal of homeopathy.)
By the way, an objective way to compare scientific journals is to use a journal ranking engine like http://www.eigenfactor.org/ or http://www.scimagojr.com. According to the latter site, Annals of Medicine is ranked 260 out of the world’s 5000 or so medical journals ; Annals of Internal Medicine (which Carolyn referred to above) is ranked 44 (rather better). The average article in Annals of Medicine are cited a third as often as articles in Annals of Internal Medicine. In other words, the article is indeed being published in a respectable, if not highly influential, peer-reviewed journal.
My mistake. However, I fear for your son. Your blind trust in companies that are fleecing well meaning but misguided parents such as yourself is very sad.
http://naturalsociety.com/3-girls-dead-others-hospitalized-after-gardasil-hpv-vaccine/
Gardasil could be Merck’s most important money earner, with expected sales of at least $2 billion.This is revenue that Merck needs desperately to recover from the Vioxx scandals. To achieve this level of success Gardasil must be required for admittance to school. With resistance from many parents, Merck is relying on political lobbying such as the big success in California to ensure compliance and meet its revenue goals.
This is the same company that LIED about Vioxx for YEARS. Are you going to trust your child’s health with these criminals? Will you be one of the ones suing Merck in 20 years for your child’s health problems from Gardasil? Probably not because companies are exempt from vaccine liability. Merck will never have to answer for the health disaster that is Gardasil the same way it has from Vioxx.
Hi Sarah,
It’s not blind trust; it’s rational evidence-based decision-making. I’ve looked at the evidence carefully, and have concluded that there is overwhelming evidence that HPV causes cancer, and that Gardasil is safe and effective. The anti-vaccine people’s arguments do not appear to be based on sound evidence.
Merck has indeed done some despicable things — but as far as I know, it’s the marketing side of Merck that was involved. The researchers and the papers they published in established peer review journals have not been implicated in any wrongdoing that I’m aware of. I can dig up more info if you like.
So, now that you’ve lost that bet, would you be willing to donate my winnings to the charity of my choice?
Respected Medical Journal Disses Gardasil — The Healthy Home Economist
http://t.co/BfH3j5C8
Peer reviewed medical journal, the Annals of Medicine, takes Gardasil to task for being neither effective or safe http://t.co/SDw5k6NS
#Children #Vaccines Respected Medical Journal Disses Gardasil http://t.co/dJr5zCtW
Respected Medical Journal Disses Gardasil http://t.co/KMuWy5fO
This is part and parcel of the profits before patients system.
One only has to look at Baychol or Tamiflu to see what a farce ( and a danger re: Baychol ) some of these medications / vaccines are.
A lot of medications are fast tracked to market before the benefit(s) to patients are weighed. Profits before patients. No one can deny a company ( big pharma in this case ) making a profit. However, when those profits come from snake oil at best and deadly at worse, things need to change. This is not in the public’s or science’s interest.
Thanks to the quick thinking of my youngest son, I caught our HMO trying to immunize both of my boys. I let them know that my sons were not to be guinea pigs for their unproven science. They think that I’m a nut case, I’m sure, but at least my boys weren’t immunized with Gardisil.
The Bionic Broad\’s last post: The whole meatball
Your boys are so very fortunate to have a fierce Mama Bear such as yourself!
That’s what it takes to navigate children safely through the vaccine and drug infested waters of a doctor’s office these days.
You are a great Mom! Your boys are blessed to have your protection.
Stanley Fishman\’s last post: Give the Gift of Real Food
If you wouldn’t mind saying, what happened? How did they almost get vaccinated?
I have 4 daughters, and our Ped has already mentioned this shot more than once.
Thank you.
Amen. I wrote about Gardasil years ago on my blog too. I knew at the time, it was only minutes before they decided to give to boys too. And guess what, boys are getting the vaccine too. Thanks for the report. I will update my article to include it.
Anna@GreenTalk\’s last post: Greener Holidays: Sage Advice to Last You Through Gift Returns
Ive said this before but I will say it again. I had HPV and had precancerous lesions all over my cervix. It was painful and I don’t wish it on anyone. The doctors wanted to remove or partially remove my cervix but decide to give me the gardasil jab to see if it would help. Thank goodness for gardasil! Ever since my booster shots I’ve been symptom free and my cervix is intact!
Jess,
from the papers I’ve read, Gardasil is probably perfectly safe to give to people who have HPV — but it doesn’t help clear the virus once you have it. So your remission probably has nothing to do with the vaccination. Still, it might help keep you from getting infected with other strains of HPV that you haven’t had before.
The reason doctors are pushing to vaccinate early is precisely because Gardasil doesn’t help once you already have HPV, so it has to be given before first sexual activity for maximum benefit.
Respected Medical Journal Disses Gardasil http://t.co/6Q8Xmcfz
aRE YOU WHAT ARE YOU THINKI9NG
ACQUIRED IMMUNITY WAS SEEN A VACCINE WAS MADE LATER
HISTORY OF VACCINE MAKERS \SMALL POX COW POX\
NO MSDS IS OF GARDASIL CERVARIX CAME AFTER?
GARDASIL DID NOT FINISH ALL ITS TESTING, AND IS NOT A HUGE THREAT TO POPULATIONS, AS TO COVER THE RUSH
MERCK AND VIOXX WELL THEY WHERE FORCED TO PULL IT
THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION
YES, THEY MUST HAVE FOUND OUT WHO, DOES WHAT AND WHEN AND WHERE AND HOW AS WELL
THIS BULLSHIT OF GARDASIL
THAT MANY PEOPLE ARE NO LIEING
NO CDC DOES NOT HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO MAKE LEGAL WITHOUT TESTING
]AND WITH TESTING IS IT NOT THE EPA THAT HANDS THE TESTING REQUIREMENTS TO THE FDA TO MAKE LEGAL
AS WITH PESTICIDES
MAKE MANDATE FOR FOR THREAT THAT S NOT!!
AND MAKE YOU SUFFER THE HPV VACCINES, DEAD PARTICLE IS KNOWN TO THE MAKERS AS A DORMANT PARTICLE, DORMANT HATCHES LATER.
THATS A TERRORSIT THREAT
THEY EVER
I WOULD NOT BE SUPPRISED IF
A COMPUTER PROGRAM
TOO ANIMATE IMPORTANT PEOPLE
TO MAKE THEM SAY WHAT THEY WANT ..
MANDATE MARTIAL LAW IT
AFTER THEY COME TO THAT
kNOW A SUPREME HIGH COURT TO MANDATE
WOULD GET THEM TO COME TO YOU
DONT WAIT FOR THEM TO COME TO YOU
STAY PUBLIC SPEAKER
ACQUIRED IMMUNITY WAS SEEN A VACCINE WAS MADE LATER
HISTORY OF VACCINE MAKERS \SMALL POX COW POX\
NO MSDS IS OF GARDASIL CERVARIX CAME AFTER?
GARDASIL DID NOT FINISH ALL ITS TESTING, for government by their own laws to pass a drug ”to fast pace it,, it needs to be a large threat to populations as to stop an epidemic
Merck lies lies lies
someone has to have dissappeared in this and the rest is true as well
MERCK AND VIOXX WELL THEY WHERE FORCED TO PULL IT
THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION
YES, THEY MUST HAVE FOUND OUT WHO, DOES WHAT AND WHEN AND WHERE AND HOW AS WELL
THIS BULLSHIT OF GARDASIL
THAT MANY PEOPLE ARE NO LIEING
NO CDC DOES NOT HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO MAKE LEGAL WITHOUT TESTING
]AND WITH TESTING IS IT NOT THE EPA THAT HANDS THE TESTING REQUIREMENTS TO THE FDA TO MAKE LEGAL
AS WITH PESTICIDES
MAKE MANDATE FOR FOR THREAT THAT S NOT!!
AND MAKE YOU SUFFER THE HPV VACCINES, DEAD PARTICLE IS KNOWN TO THE MAKERS AS A DORMANT PARTICLE, DORMANT HATCHES LATER.
THATS A TERRORSIT THREAT
THEY EVER
I WOULD NOT BE SUPPRISED IF
A COMPUTER PROGRAM
TOO ANIMATE IMPORTANT PEOPLE
TO MAKE THEM SAY WHAT THEY WANT ..
MANDATE MARTIAL LAW IT
AFTER THEY COME TO THAT
kNOW A SUPREME HIGH COURT TO MANDATE
WOULD GET THEM TO COME TO YOU
DONT WAIT FOR THEM TO COME TO YOU
label is a lie product is a lie
to sue merck for everything government does not protect a lie
STAY PUBLIC SPEAKER
My body was damaged from receiving the Gardasil shots when I was 18. Another woman I know has severe psychological issues and has frequent migraines. Doctors have told me that they have had patients experience a seizure 15 minutes or less after the shot. I had one, myself. Telling people that the evidence supports that it is safe is a slap in the face to me. I know more people hurt from it than not. While HPV is an epidemic, only a small fraction is able to *increase*, not cause, your risk of cervical cancer. So keep stating that it’s safe. Go ahead and get the shots to prove to me that you didn’t pass out, have a seizure, needed to go to the ER, and have doctors tell you that the shots made you infirtile. Yeah, it’s harmless.
Hello, I would like to add my story about Gardisil. I took my daughter to the Dr. for an appointment and after she was checked out the Dr. told me that she needed to be vaccinated with Gardisil. I asked him what it was and I know from experience that not all vaccinations or medications do what they say. So, I replied, “NO, I do not want her to have it.” I wanted it to be out longer,so that I could see if there was truly a benefit from the vaccine, because these days all you see is commercials saying,”If you have taken”, and then give a list of reactions that the medication had caused. This was after the medication or vaccination was promoted as being safe and alright to use. Well, the Dr. literally told me..”Do you want your child to get cancer?” I was beside myself and I got very upset. I said,” NO!, I do NOT want her to get cancer.” The DR. became very pushy and then tried to guilt me into giving her the vaccination. I was appauled. My daughter could not believe how he was acting, so we got up and left. In my opinion, when the government starts pushing vaccinations upon “the people”, then something isn’t right. When we do not have a choice about our own bodies then no good can come of it. Something isn’t right. I think, on some level if the Govt. keeps the people sick in some way then that would insure money in the future. Why are the Dr.’s here not taught to heal, but to only treat the symptoms at the moment, and not try to cure it from coming back? Money. Kick backs from pharmaceutical companies to Dr’s., Insurance Companies, Govt., agencies,etc., make me sick. So much for the land of the free. We are slowly becoming a dictatorsip of someone else’s idea of what “I” need in “my” life and that’s not right. We`are giving the Govt. to much control over what “we” need for ourselves. Anyways, I wanted to tell everyone what happened with Gardisil and to be careful in the future. GOD Bless,Nikki
Respected Medical Journal Disses Gardasil http://t.co/mwYczesN ALL #doctors & anyone wanting to get the #Gardasil #hpv #vaccine must read
Take a real immunology and microbiology course before you quickly denounce vaccines. Not all are perfect, true, but as a result of embracing some vaccines, we have virtually eliminated small pox and polio in this country amongst others. And please be aware that there are differences in vaccines (live, attenuated, toxoid, etc.) and the body’s immune system has various ways to take vaccine components and create a decent memory for the compounds (even if the titre changes over time and you need a booster).
And as for HPV vaccines, blind acceptance is no excuse when it comes to evidence-based practice. I’m more interested to see if there are major long-term repercussions because HPV 16 and 18 are no laughing matter (nor are the genital warts causing HPV strains). As a mid-twenties female clinician myself, I’m just not sure if these HPV-prevention vaccines were tested thoroughly enough for long term consequences. But if you or your daughter could potentially be involved with high-risk situations in regards to HPV, that’s a factor you should consider as well and not just simply trash vaccines in general. I’m not yet comfortable with the vaccine and have personally waited until more research comes out. But please don’t be afraid of other tried-true-vaccines – they have saved millions upon millions! Just find your research from WELL RESPECTED, GOOD sources and journals!
# laevern on Thu, 15th Mar 2012 2:16 PM
Not all testing was done,
side effects are proven with the MSDS sheet
and that is how they pull the drug off the market as history with pulling bad drugs off the market ‘VIOXX’
so gardasil and all hpv vaccines can not be proven to harm or be pulled from the market
Merck can just keep on as they have
Wake up
This is terrorist stuff
HPV vaccines skipped the legal process through the loop hole, something that threatens as the black plague, then a vaccine can skip the testing requirements
merck lies lies lies
mercks lost its mind when they put VIOXX on the market
it seems as merck was more doing its homework on how to prevent pulling a drug off the market in VIOXX HISTORY
lot more
sueing for side effects
sue for international terrorism this hpv vaccine shit it international
and Merck cannot prove that hpv is like the plague too skip the testing protocols
gardasil Laevern
internet search
laevern
Oct 17, 2011 19:03
What kind of efforts are those
discuss
What product goes to market without all testing and gets legal
NONe
then try to mandate it/./
Merck is the pusher
All that talk sounds like somethings being done
but thats it
Nothing is being done
Send out a PLAY
SUPREME HIGH COURT GARDASIL
MANDATE
,
they, those behind it, will come, that is their intention
Mandate, what has not been tested
does not make sence
they must be retarded and took CDC or FDA or something
By Canary Party
SANE Vax tested 13 vials of the Gardasil vaccine, from six different countries, and found that all were contaminated with genetically modified HPV DNA. The vaccine maker Merck, has claimed for the last five years on the package insert that the vaccine contains NO viral DNA. That claim quietly disappeared from the insert this past April, without any explanation, warning or notice being offered to the pubic.
Keep in mind that the National Institutes of Health holds a patent on the technology that makes the HPV vaccine possible, profiting off of every HPV vaccine sold, and what that might mean with respect to the Department of Health and Human Services taking appropriate action on all the emerging and glaring problems with these vaccines.
This is especially important information to get into the public view, as California has just passed a law mandating children as young as 12 to be given the vaccine without parental consent being required.
KEEP LOOKING THIS IS MORE REAL THAN TERRORISTIC
DANGER
DANGER
DANGER
in an effort to help her now very sick daughter the mother went to an MD practicing naturopath who conducted a toxicity test that eventually found HPV DNA in the girl’s blood. The significance of this finding is that it is highly unusual to find HPV DNA in the blood. HPV, if present in the body, exists in the epithelial (skin and mucosa) membranes. HPV or its DNA, by itself does not survive for any great length of time in the bloodstream. Why was the HPV DNA in her bloodstream two years post-vaccination?
mucous membranes
watch out researchers
it would not feel , real unsafe to not take precaution in these hpv vaccines
I dont want any in my nose because it seems safe to not worry
how easy it may pass
as these strains of hpv really MERCK says it knows
noone really does know the danger presented
DANGER
DANGER
DANGER
WHO IS SANE VAX
DANGER DANGER DANGER
they will remove who does aid in the prevention and the criminal process of international terrorists
of a product gardasil all hpv vaccines
they are not legal
they skiped the legal process and lied merck lied in that
DANGER DANGER DANGER
SANE VAX
who is that they do not have even my earned trust yet
The missing issue is simple: why should this be mandatory? Let’s assume for argument it’s 100% safe, and 100% effective (neither are bound to be true). The government still should not require it. Why not if it’s safe and effective? Because no overwhelming need exists. Governments are instituted to protect freedoms, not restrict them. Certainly, in the event of some communicable diseases society has a need to protect people as a group, but that’s not the issue here.
{ 1 trackback }